Oxaide

Independent BESS & Solar Forensics. Physics-Grade Certainty.

Start with a scoped forensic review, then add a continuous monitoring layer only where it is justified. We identify lithium plating, capacity fade, and yield leakage from historical telemetry before they become safety, warranty, or performance questions.

Start with your work email. The next step is a short operator brief.

Controlled handling. Air-gapped where required. Customer-controlled deployment available.Review scope first. Deployment and monitoring depth follow the actual asset need.

Singapore-hosted review workflowConfidential review by default

From one-time Verify review to Horizon monitoring, with room to extend later into degradation-aware dispatch work if the site warrants it.

Relevant Prior Platform Work

Singapore-Headquartered β€’ 7+ Years Platform Engineering

Institute of Mental Health - Analytics platform
Singtel (Amobee) - Revenue optimization platform
SingHealth - Healthcare platform
Adecco - Workforce platform

Enterprise-Grade Infrastructure

Microsoft Azure
CloudflareCloudflare
The Oxaide Approach

Serious diagnostics for asset teams.
Clear scope, controlled deployment, and no consultancy theatre

Most diagnostic tools add another screen and another monthly bill. Oxaide is built to shorten the path to a usable technical decision, with deployment options that match the site.

Time to clarity

The Oxaide Wayβœ“
5-day forensic decision

Send the telemetry. We return a defensible view on degradation, yield loss, and the next move without dragging you through a long workshop cycle first.

The Industry Standardβœ—
Spreadsheet drift

Too many teams spend weeks reconciling dashboards, vendor opinions, and loose spreadsheets before anyone states what is actually wrong.

Data ownership

The Oxaide Wayβœ“
You decide the boundary

Verify runs through a controlled review workflow. Horizon can run on infrastructure you control. Your telemetry stays on terms you can defend internally.

The Industry Standardβœ—
Tool-first data grab

Generic platforms often ask for broad data access before they have earned trust or produced a specialist answer.

Commercial fit

The Oxaide Wayβœ“
Start narrow. Expand on evidence.

Begin with a defined review. Move into monitoring only when the site, fleet, and operating risk genuinely justify it.

The Industry Standardβœ—
Platform decision too early

Long studies and open-ended retainers often start before the owner has a crisp technical answer.

Method evidence

Let buyers inspect the evidence before they appoint the team.

These assets work best as technical reference points: enough to show depth, disciplined enough to stay inside what the public evidence can support.

REFERENCE DATASET
OxfordICA

dQ/dV peak-shift logic.

Peak shift

Method signal

Oxford derivative fingerprinting

Use dQ/dV evidence to make degradation mode, usable-capacity drift, and cell-stress interpretation legible to technical buyers.

Review ICA method→
ANOMALY PRECURSOR
NASAAnomaly

Resistance and precursor logic.

Internal resistance

Public benchmark

NASA anomaly precursor logic

A clean way to show early-warning reasoning: abnormal transition behaviour, resistance stress, and precursor detection before dashboard narratives harden.

See NASA validation→
STRESS REGIME
DispatchContext

Throughput and operating regime context.

Stress regime

Decision context

From signal to asset decision

The important move is not the chart itself. It is translating technical evidence into underwriting, O&M, warranty, and diligence decisions.

Review commercial bridge→

Claim discipline

These visuals matter because they show how Oxaide reasons from benchmark evidence to live-asset review. Public benchmark work supports the method; live telemetry, operating history, and scope determine the final conclusion.

Capabilities Briefing

How Oxaide Works:
The 2026 Capabilities Overview

A direct briefing on what Oxaide reviews, how the methods are validated, and where Verify and Horizon fit in a serious engagement.

Review scope and sample outputs
dQ/dV and resistance profiling methods
Cyber, privacy, and controls review support
Managed and air-gapped deployment options

Inside the briefing

β€’ What dQ/dV and resistance profiling reveal that standard dashboards do not

β€’ Typical degradation and yield-loss patterns we look for in BESS and solar telemetry

β€’ How Verify and Horizon fit into a sensible engagement path

Open Briefing
Public technical briefing10 pagesLatest revision
Oxaide institutional technical briefing cover for BESS and solar diagnostics

Focus

BESS + Solar

Start with a defined review

If you already have telemetry exports, we can review the asset first and recommend the right next step. Verify is the usual starting point. Horizon follows only when continuous monitoring is warranted.

Share the operating context first. The next step is a short operator brief.

Prefer a direct conversation?
No shared-model trainingSingapore-hosted review workflowDirect technical scoping
Scoped data handling
Encrypted review workflow
Customer-controlled deployment options
Direct principal review