Oxaide

Independent BESS diagnostics for capital, warranty, and operating-risk decisions.

Start with a scoped forensic review, then add a continuous monitoring layer only where it is justified. Oxaide reads raw telemetry to surface plating risk, capacity fade, derating, and revenue leakage before they distort underwriting, warranty, or operating decisions.

Start with your work email. The next step is a short operator brief.

Controlled handling. Air-gapped where required. Customer-controlled deployment available.Review scope first. Deployment and monitoring depth follow the actual asset need.

Customer-controlled review workflowConfidential review by default

From one-time Verify review to Horizon monitoring, with room to extend later into degradation-aware dispatch work if the commercial case warrants it.

Relevant Prior Infrastructure Work

Singapore-Headquartered • 7+ Years Platform Engineering

Institute of Mental Health - Analytics platform
Singtel (Amobee) - Revenue optimization platform
SingHealth - Healthcare platform
Adecco - Workforce platform

Enterprise-Grade Infrastructure

Microsoft Azure
CloudflareCloudflare
The Oxaide Approach

Serious diagnostics for asset teams.
Clear scope, controlled deployment, and principal-level accountability

Most monitoring products add another dashboard. Oxaide is built to shorten the path to a usable technical decision, with deployment options that match the site.

Time to clarity

The Oxaide Way
5-day forensic decision

Send the telemetry. We return a defensible view on degradation, derating, and the next move without dragging you through a long workshop cycle first.

The Industry Standard
Spreadsheet drift

Too many teams spend weeks reconciling dashboards, vendor opinions, and loose spreadsheets before anyone states what is actually wrong.

Data ownership

The Oxaide Way
You decide the boundary

Verify runs through a controlled review workflow. Horizon can run on infrastructure you control. Your telemetry stays on terms you can defend internally.

The Industry Standard
Tool-first data grab

Generic platforms often ask for broad data access before they have earned trust or produced a specialist answer.

Commercial fit

The Oxaide Way
Start narrow. Expand on evidence.

Begin with a defined review. Move into monitoring only when the site, fleet, and operating risk genuinely justify it.

The Industry Standard
Platform decision too early

Long studies and open-ended retainers often start before the owner has a crisp technical answer or a mandate-level reason to expand scope.

Method evidence

Inspect the evidence before you issue the mandate.

These assets work best as public technical anchors: enough to show depth, disciplined enough to stay inside what the benchmark evidence can support.

REFERENCE DATASET
OxfordICA

dQ/dV peak-shift logic.

Peak shift

Method signal

Oxford derivative fingerprinting

Use dQ/dV evidence to make degradation mode, usable-capacity drift, and cell-stress interpretation legible to technical buyers.

Review ICA method
ANOMALY PRECURSOR
NASAAnomaly

Resistance and precursor logic.

Internal resistance

Public benchmark

NASA anomaly precursor logic

A clean way to show early-warning reasoning: abnormal transition behaviour, resistance stress, and precursor detection before dashboard narratives harden.

See NASA validation
STRESS REGIME
DispatchContext

Throughput and operating regime context.

Stress regime

Decision context

From signal to asset decision

The important move is not the chart itself. It is translating technical evidence into underwriting, O&M, warranty, and diligence decisions.

Review commercial bridge

Claim discipline

These visuals matter because they show how Oxaide reasons from benchmark evidence to live-asset review. Public benchmark work supports method discipline; live telemetry, operating history, and scope determine the final conclusion.

Capabilities Briefing

Principal briefing:
Review scope, method, and deployment posture

A principal-led briefing on mandate fit, method evidence, deployment options, and where Verify and Horizon fit in a serious engagement.

Review scope and sample outputs
dQ/dV and resistance profiling methods
Cyber, privacy, and controls review support
Managed and air-gapped deployment options

Inside the briefing

• What the review can and cannot conclude from telemetry alone

• The degradation, derating, and operating-risk patterns we look for in BESS telemetry

• How Verify and Horizon fit into a disciplined engagement path

Open Briefing
Principal briefing10 pagesPublic edition
Oxaide institutional technical briefing cover for BESS diagnostics

Focus

BESS-First Review

Start with a defined review

If you already have telemetry exports, we can review the asset first and recommend the right next step. Verify is the usual starting point. Horizon follows only when continuous monitoring is warranted.

Share the asset context first. The next step is a short scoping call.

Prefer a direct conversation?
No shared-model trainingCustomer-controlled deployment optionsDirect technical scoping
Scoped data handling
Encrypted review workflow
Customer-controlled deployment options
Direct principal review