Oxaide Research

Research companies, assets, and markets with a workspace that remembers your thesis.

Turn questions into source-linked analysis, keep the evidence and counter-evidence behind your view, and compare what changed when you return.

Public-source workflows cover equities and ETFs, rates and macro, crypto price proxies, and read-only prediction-market context. Source depth and freshness vary by market.

Start free trial View example research View pricing

7 days · 10 completed turns · one workspace · no card required. Research and decision support only, not personalized advice, signals, execution, custody, or guaranteed returns.

Example research workspace

Public-data example

Thesis challengeMixed evidence

Research question

Is large-cap technology leadership broadening rather than narrowing?

The matched proxy evidence is mixed. It can describe relative market behavior, but it cannot establish company-level breadth on its own.

Supporting

Positive-day frequency was similar in the matched sample: 54.23% for SPY and 54.86% for QQQ.

Weakening

QQQ carried higher daily volatility and a deeper maximum drawdown than SPY over the same window.

Missing

Price proxies alone cannot establish breadth across companies. Equal-weight and fundamental evidence still need review.

Source trail

Retrieved 13 Jul 2026

SPY adjusted data QQQ adjusted data

SPY daily adjusted-return distribution generated from 1,254 public observations — Public adjusted-price observations retrieved 13 July 2026. Historical proxy analysis only, not a forecast or recommendation.

Proof, not a chatbot promise

See the claim, the counter-evidence, and the source trail.

This example compared SPY and QQQ over the same five-year adjusted-close window, generated a reusable chart, and kept the interpretation limits beside the result.

Sources and retrieval times remain attached to the finding.
Supporting, weakening, and missing evidence stay visible together.
Measurement choices and proxy limits are stated instead of hidden.
The memo and chart become files you can reopen and challenge later.

Read the full example

TradFi research, with the evidence attached

Move from market behavior to the filings and fundamentals behind the view.

Start with a public-market question, inspect the source trail and measurement contract, then carry the same thesis into earnings and filing reviews. Conflicting evidence and missing checks remain visible.

Share the reviewed result

Preview a frozen read-only snapshot, choose its expiry, copy the public link, and revoke it later.

SPY and QQQ matched-window risk scorecard comparing five historical risk measures

Public equity risk comparison Retrieved 13 Jul 2026

Did technology leadership come with materially different downside risk?

Oxaide compared SPY and QQQ over the same five-year adjusted-close window. The result kept volatility, tail loss, drawdown, and the limits of ETF proxies beside the conclusion instead of treating historical return as the whole story.

QQQ daily volatility was 1.44% versus 1.08% for SPY over the matched sample.

QQQ had a deeper maximum drawdown at -35.12%, compared with -24.50% for SPY.

Positive-day frequency was similar, so the risk difference was not simply a difference in how often each proxy rose.

Yahoo Finance public chart endpoints for SPY and QQQ

Historical adjusted-price proxies only. The result is not a forecast, recommendation, or substitute for company-level breadth and fundamental evidence.

Inspect the full source trail

Company research workflow

What changed in earnings quality and management guidance?

Compare like-for-like reporting periods, reconcile profit with cash generation, and tie changed segment trends, margins, guidance, and definitions back to the saved thesis.

Separate reported growth from acquisitions, currency, and changed definitions.
Test cash conversion, working capital, adjustments, and recurring economics together.
Record which thesis assumptions strengthened, weakened, or remain unresolved.

SEC filings, issuer results, and earnings materials

Company disclosures can contain estimates, revisions, and management framing. Material findings still require human verification.

See the earnings comparison method

Ongoing filing monitor

Which filing changes are material to the thesis?

Review the sections that can change an investment view, then preserve the old and new evidence instead of reducing a 10-K, 10-Q, or earnings call to a generic summary.

Track risk factors, segment disclosures, liquidity, guidance, and capital allocation.
Distinguish material wording changes from formatting noise.
Carry unresolved checks into the next filing or earnings review.

SEC EDGAR and issuer primary sources

Automated comparisons can overemphasize wording changes and cannot identify every material development between reporting dates.

See the filing-change workflow

Selected experience behind Oxaide

Selected organisations and products from the software and data work behind the company.

Less research drift

Keep the evidence, the reasoning, and the next change together.

Oxaide turns scattered research into a record you can revisit, challenge, and update instead of starting from a blank page each time.

A living research recordUpdated today

Evidence reviewed

Filing✓

Earnings call✓

Market data✓

Evidence change

One assumption weakened. A new catalyst needs review.

The source, previous thesis, and uncertainty remain visible for the next decision.

See the evidence behind the answer

Keep important findings connected to their sources, dates, and coverage limits.

Continue from your last conclusion

Return to the thesis, assumptions, risks, and catalysts you already worked through.

Review changes, not everything again

Focus the next review on evidence that strengthens, weakens, or complicates your view.

Useful from the first question

Start with research you will want to revisit.

A memo is useful once. A saved view with explicit sources, assumptions, and missing checks stays useful when you return with new evidence.

Company research

What would change my view on this company?

First research run

Build a source-linked memo around the business, valuation context, catalysts, risks, and evidence that weakens the thesis.

Why it stays useful

Save the thesis and review new filings, earnings, and material evidence against the assumptions you already made.

Market risk

Is this market move unusual or just noisy?

First research run

Compare return distributions, volatility, drawdowns, tail outcomes, and benchmark behavior with the measurement choices kept visible.

Why it stays useful

Keep a dated market view and revisit it when volatility, correlations, or the evidence behind the regime changes.

Earnings and filings

What changed in earnings quality and management guidance?

First research run

Compare the latest filing, earnings release, cash flow, segment trends, margins, guidance, and prior comparable period with source dates kept visible.

Why it stays useful

Carry forward the assumptions and unresolved checks, then revisit them when the next filing, investor update, or guidance change arrives.

Private by default. Oxaide provides research and decision support, not signals, personalized recommendations, execution, custody, or guaranteed returns.

Try a research question

How Oxaide works

From a research question to a review-ready evidence record.

Oxaide keeps the question, source trail, saved thesis, and later evidence in one reviewable loop while the final decision stays with you.

Ask the question

Start with a company, asset, industry, market, event, or thesis.

Connect the evidence

Keep findings tied to sources, dates, assumptions, and missing coverage.

Save the thesis

Preserve supporting evidence, risks, catalysts, and invalidation conditions.

Review what changed

Bring back new evidence and compare it with the saved assumptions, risks, and missing checks.

Evidence changeNew filing weakens one assumption and adds a catalyst for review.Human decision →

Why choose Oxaide?

Choose the research tool that fits the job.

Oxaide is built for one specific job: keeping a thesis, its evidence, and the next review connected. Other tools may be a better fit when your priority is broad AI assistance, dense market data, or an enterprise content library.

Comparison of Oxaide Research with general AI research tools, market data platforms, and enterprise intelligence suites.
Compare	Oxaide Research Focused research workspace	General AI research Chat and search tools	Market data platforms Screeners and terminals	Enterprise intelligence Premium research suites
Best when you need to	Revisiting a thesis and seeing what changed	Broad questions and mixed day-to-day tasks	Screening, charting, and monitoring structured market data	Premium content, internal data, and large-team workflows
You start with	A research question and the view you want to test	A prompt, search, or uploaded file	A ticker, filter, watchlist, or dashboard	A proprietary corpus or configured team workflow
Typical output	Source-linked memo with supporting, weakening, and missing evidence	Cited answer or one-off research report	Charts, screens, estimates, and portfolio views	Cited synthesis, monitoring, and client-ready deliverables
What carries forward	Saved thesis, assumptions, unresolved checks, and later evidence review	Chat history or projects that you organise	Watchlists, alerts, dashboards, and saved screens	Shared monitoring and research workflows across a firm
Data posture	Public and user-provided sources, with uncertainty kept visible	Open web and connected apps, depending on the product	Licensed financial datasets and market feeds	Premium, proprietary, and internal content
Buying path	Self-serve · 7-day trial · $59/month	Usually self-serve with free and paid tiers	Free to professional tiers, often priced by data depth	Typically sales-led with custom or per-seat pricing

Oxaide Research

Best for thesis review

Focused research workspace

Best when you need to: Revisiting a thesis and seeing what changed
You start with: A research question and the view you want to test
Typical output: Source-linked memo with supporting, weakening, and missing evidence
What carries forward: Saved thesis, assumptions, unresolved checks, and later evidence review
Data posture: Public and user-provided sources, with uncertainty kept visible
Buying path: Self-serve · 7-day trial · $59/month

General AI research

Chat and search tools

Best when you need to: Broad questions and mixed day-to-day tasks
You start with: A prompt, search, or uploaded file
Typical output: Cited answer or one-off research report
What carries forward: Chat history or projects that you organise
Data posture: Open web and connected apps, depending on the product
Buying path: Usually self-serve with free and paid tiers

Market data platforms

Screeners and terminals

Best when you need to: Screening, charting, and monitoring structured market data
You start with: A ticker, filter, watchlist, or dashboard
Typical output: Charts, screens, estimates, and portfolio views
What carries forward: Watchlists, alerts, dashboards, and saved screens
Data posture: Licensed financial datasets and market feeds
Buying path: Free to professional tiers, often priced by data depth

Enterprise intelligence

Premium research suites

Best when you need to: Premium content, internal data, and large-team workflows
You start with: A proprietary corpus or configured team workflow
Typical output: Cited synthesis, monitoring, and client-ready deliverables
What carries forward: Shared monitoring and research workflows across a firm
Data posture: Premium, proprietary, and internal content
Buying path: Typically sales-led with custom or per-seat pricing

The practical difference: Oxaide does not try to replace a market-data terminal or a general assistant. It gives your research a durable thesis and evidence record.

Try Oxaide free

Simple pricing

One plan for one private research workspace.

No feature maze and no team tiers. Researcher includes the complete workspace, a single seat, and a clear monthly usage limit.

Researcher

50 completed research turns each month · 1 seat · email support

$59 / month

Start free trial

7-day trial with 10 completed turns. No card required. Researcher stops at the included monthly limit.

Built for serious research

Spend less time rebuilding context. Spend more time testing the view.

Start with one private workspace and give every company, asset, industry, or market thesis a source-linked research history.

Start free trial View pricing

Research companies, assets, and markets with a workspace that remembers your thesis.

Turn questions into source-linked analysis, keep the evidence and counter-evidence behind your view, and compare what changed when you return.

Public-source workflows cover equities and ETFs, rates and macro, crypto price proxies, and read-only prediction-market context. Source depth and freshness vary by market.

7 days · 10 completed turns · one workspace · no card required. Research and decision support only, not personalized advice, signals, execution, custody, or guaranteed returns.

Is large-cap technology leadership broadening rather than narrowing?

The matched proxy evidence is mixed. It can describe relative market behavior, but it cannot establish company-level breadth on its own.

Supporting

Positive-day frequency was similar in the matched sample: 54.23% for SPY and 54.86% for QQQ.

Weakening

QQQ carried higher daily volatility and a deeper maximum drawdown than SPY over the same window.

Missing

Price proxies alone cannot establish breadth across companies. Equal-weight and fundamental evidence still need review.

See the claim, the counter-evidence, and the source trail.

This example compared SPY and QQQ over the same five-year adjusted-close window, generated a reusable chart, and kept the interpretation limits beside the result.

Sources and retrieval times remain attached to the finding.

Supporting, weakening, and missing evidence stay visible together.

Measurement choices and proxy limits are stated instead of hidden.

The memo and chart become files you can reopen and challenge later.

Read the full example

Compare

Oxaide Research

Focused research workspace

General AI research

Chat and search tools

Market data platforms

Screeners and terminals

Enterprise intelligence

Premium research suites

Best when you need to

Revisiting a thesis and seeing what changed

Broad questions and mixed day-to-day tasks

Screening, charting, and monitoring structured market data

Premium content, internal data, and large-team workflows

You start with

A research question and the view you want to test

A prompt, search, or uploaded file

A ticker, filter, watchlist, or dashboard

A proprietary corpus or configured team workflow

Typical output

Source-linked memo with supporting, weakening, and missing evidence

Cited answer or one-off research report

Charts, screens, estimates, and portfolio views

Cited synthesis, monitoring, and client-ready deliverables

What carries forward

Saved thesis, assumptions, unresolved checks, and later evidence review

Chat history or projects that you organise

Watchlists, alerts, dashboards, and saved screens

Shared monitoring and research workflows across a firm

Data posture

Public and user-provided sources, with uncertainty kept visible

Open web and connected apps, depending on the product

Licensed financial datasets and market feeds

Premium, proprietary, and internal content

Buying path

Self-serve · 7-day trial · $59/month

Usually self-serve with free and paid tiers

Free to professional tiers, often priced by data depth

Typically sales-led with custom or per-seat pricing