Oxaide Research · Private by default

    Know what changed, what supports or weakens your thesis, and what still needs review.

    Ask a research question. Oxaide gathers public sources, compares the numbers, tests the claim against contrary evidence, and produces analysis you can inspect and reuse.

    Company fundamentals, SEC filings, earnings, equities and ETFs, rates and macro, crypto price proxies, and read-only prediction-market context. Source depth and freshness vary by market.

    Source-linked memo + chartRetrieval time & limits visibleSaved for re-review
    Start free trial View example research View pricing
    ✓ 7 days · 10 full runsOne workspace · no card requiredNot advice, signals, execution, or custody.
    Hosted research workspace
    Live preview
    Brand-consistent preview of the Oxaide research workspace: source-linked tech-market answer with retrieval time, limitation, and evidence-change cues on one screen

    Private research workspace · source-linked answer with evidence-change cues on one screen.

    Start with one of these questions
    30-min private handoff Private by default

    Private 30-min handoff · not in URL/analytics · ↵ to start

    Generated research artifactSVG + memo
    SPY daily adjusted-return distribution generated from 1,254 public observations
    Retrieved 13 Jul 2026 — Historical proxy analysis, not a forecast.

    Proof, not a chatbot promise

    See the claim, the counter-evidence, and the source trail.

    SPY vs QQQ over the same five-year adjusted-close window — reusable chart, with limits beside the result.

    • Sources and retrieval times remain attached to the finding.
    • Supporting, weakening, and missing evidence stay visible together.
    • Measurement choices and proxy limits are stated instead of hidden.
    • The memo and chart become files you can reopen and challenge later.
    Read the full example

    TradFi research, with the evidence attached

    Move from market behavior to the filings and fundamentals behind the view.

    Start with a public-market question, inspect the source trail and measurement contract, then carry the same thesis into earnings and filing reviews. Conflicting evidence and missing checks remain visible.

    Share the reviewed result

    Preview a frozen read-only snapshot, choose its expiry, copy the public link, and revoke it later.

    SPY and QQQ matched-window risk scorecard comparing five historical risk measures
    Public equity risk comparison Retrieved 13 Jul 2026

    Did technology leadership come with materially different downside risk?

    Oxaide compared SPY and QQQ over the same five-year adjusted-close window. The result kept volatility, tail loss, drawdown, and the limits of ETF proxies beside the conclusion instead of treating historical return as the whole story.

    01

    QQQ daily volatility was 1.44% versus 1.08% for SPY over the matched sample.

    02

    QQQ had a deeper maximum drawdown at -35.12%, compared with -24.50% for SPY.

    03

    Positive-day frequency was similar, so the risk difference was not simply a difference in how often each proxy rose.

    Yahoo Finance public chart endpoints for SPY and QQQ

    Historical adjusted-price proxies only. The result is not a forecast, recommendation, or substitute for company-level breadth and fundamental evidence.

    Inspect the full source trail
    Company research workflow

    What changed in earnings quality and management guidance?

    Compare like-for-like reporting periods, reconcile profit with cash generation, and tie changed segment trends, margins, guidance, and definitions back to the saved thesis.

    • Separate reported growth from acquisitions, currency, and changed definitions.
    • Test cash conversion, working capital, adjustments, and recurring economics together.
    • Record which thesis assumptions strengthened, weakened, or remain unresolved.

    SEC filings, issuer results, and earnings materials

    Company disclosures can contain estimates, revisions, and management framing. Material findings still require human verification.

    See the earnings comparison method
    Ongoing filing monitor

    Which filing changes are material to the thesis?

    Review the sections that can change an investment view, then preserve the old and new evidence instead of reducing a 10-K, 10-Q, or earnings call to a generic summary.

    • Track risk factors, segment disclosures, liquidity, guidance, and capital allocation.
    • Distinguish material wording changes from formatting noise.
    • Carry unresolved checks into the next filing or earnings review.

    SEC EDGAR and issuer primary sources

    Automated comparisons can overemphasize wording changes and cannot identify every material development between reporting dates.

    See the filing-change workflow

    Selected experience behind Oxaide

    Selected organisations and products from the software and data work behind the company.

    Clyde & Co
    Institute of Mental Health
    Singtel
    SingHealth
    Adecco
    Rice Media
    Weiken
    Primustech
    Maven Group
    Latenx

    Research that compounds

    Your thesis keeps its memory.

    Chat answers evaporate. Oxaide keeps a durable research record — question, sources and retrieval times, what supported or weakened your view, and what still needs checking — so the next run diffs, not duplicates, the work.

    Thesis memory Snapshot → diff, not re-do
    Thesis v113 Jul 2026

    NVDA earnings quality — Q2 view

    • Assumption:DC growth ex-FX >35%
    • Risk: Inventory if capex pauses
    • Invalidation:CC <80% ×2Q
    3 sources2 checks
    New evidence2h ago

    10-Q: Risk Factors + Segment note updated

    Retrieved 2026-07-14 · 06:03Z

    Supply-chain risk reworded; DC +3.2% q/q, inventory +18%.

    Segment disclosurechanged
    Cash flowadded
    Evidence diffNow

    What changed vs your thesis

    Supports · margin stable

    74.1% vs 73.8% — holds.

    Weakens · CC 76%

    Below 80% — review WC.

    Needs review · guidance

    FY guide +2% — verify.

    Human decision — not a signal.

    Thesis + sources New snapshot Diff view
    Review changes, not everything again
    A living research record Updated today

    Evidence reviewed

    Filing

    10-Q · 2h ago

    ● changed

    Earnings call

    Transcript · verified

    + added

    Market data

    Yahoo · 1,254 obs

    — same
    Evidence change

    One assumption weakened. A new catalyst needs review.

    Source, prior thesis, and uncertainty stay visible.

    ✓ supports 1⚠ weakens 1? review 1
    01

    See the evidence behind the answer

    Every finding keeps its source, date, retrieval stamp, and coverage limits — no orphan claims.

    02

    Continue from your last conclusion

    Return to thesis, assumptions, risks, and catalysts you already worked through. No re-explaining.

    03

    Review changes, not everything again

    Next run surfaces only what strengthens, weakens, or complicates your view — with diff badges.

    Built for financial questions

    Give the agent a real research job.

    Run a company review, test a market claim, or compare reporting periods. Keep the sources and unresolved questions so the next run starts from evidence rather than memory.

    Company research

    01

    What would change my view on this company?

    First research run

    Build a source-linked memo around the business, valuation context, catalysts, risks, and evidence that weakens the thesis.

    Why it stays useful

    Save the thesis and review new filings, earnings, and material evidence against the assumptions you already made.

    Market risk

    02

    Is this market move unusual or just noisy?

    First research run

    Compare return distributions, volatility, drawdowns, tail outcomes, and benchmark behavior with the measurement choices kept visible.

    Why it stays useful

    Keep a dated market view and revisit it when volatility, correlations, or the evidence behind the regime changes.

    Earnings and filings

    03

    What changed in earnings quality and management guidance?

    First research run

    Compare the latest filing, earnings release, cash flow, segment trends, margins, guidance, and prior comparable period with source dates kept visible.

    Why it stays useful

    Carry forward the assumptions and unresolved checks, then revisit them when the next filing, investor update, or guidance change arrives.

    Private by default. Oxaide provides research and decision support, not signals, personalized recommendations, execution, custody, or guaranteed returns.

    Try a research question

    Thesis monitoring

    Run the next review on schedule.

    Set a one-time date or recurring cadence for a defined research task, such as checking a new filing or refreshing a market-risk comparison. Oxaide saves the result and supporting files for review.

    Scheduled Research uses your workspace usage allowance. It does not make investment decisions, place trades, continuously monitor every event, or guarantee that every material change will be detected.

    How Oxaide works

    From question to sourced analysis in four steps.

    The agent researches, structures, and preserves the work. You inspect the evidence, challenge the conclusion, and make the decision.

    Review what changed
    Q01

    Ask the question

    A company, filing, asset, industry, or thesis to test — plain English is fine.

    ◐02

    Agent researches

    Gathers sources, uses tools, compares evidence, and drafts a source-linked memo + chart.

    ✓03

    You inspect & save

    Challenge sources, calculations, counter-evidence, risks, and limits — then keep as thesis v1.

    Δ04

    Diff what changed

    Bring new evidence; Oxaide diffs supports / weakens / needs review vs saved thesis. You decide.

    Evidence changeNew filing weakens one assumption and adds a catalyst.Human decision →

    Where Oxaide fits

    Use a financial research agent when a chat answer is not enough—and a code agent is the wrong tool.

    Oxaide does not claim to be a universally smarter model. It is a specialized product for research that needs a source trail, explicit calculations, contrary evidence, saved context, and a later review.

    Claude and general assistants

    Chat answers, writing, search, and mixed everyday questions.

    A chat answer is a moment. Oxaide adds the workflow: source provenance, contrary evidence, saved theses, scheduled reviews, and a durable research record.

    Codex and coding agents

    Changing code, running terminals and tests, and producing software artifacts.

    Codex changes software; Oxaide changes how you review evidence. It is organized around companies, filings, markets, and human investment decisions—not software delivery.

    Default Hermes runtime

    General agent execution with tools, files, conversations, and artifacts.

    Oxaide is the managed financial-research product around that runtime: identity, private workspaces, billing, research policy, saved context, scheduling, and read-only sharing.

    Comparison of Oxaide Research with general AI research tools, market data platforms, and enterprise intelligence suites.
    Compare

    Oxaide Research

    Financial research agents

    General AI research

    Chat and search tools

    Market data platforms

    Screeners and terminals

    Enterprise intelligence

    Premium research suites

    Best when you need toInvestigating a company or market question and reviewing what changedBroad questions and mixed day-to-day tasksScreening, charting, and monitoring structured market dataPremium content, internal data, and large-team workflows
    You start withA company, asset, filing, dataset, event, or thesis to testA prompt, search, or uploaded fileA ticker, filter, watchlist, or dashboardA proprietary corpus or configured team workflow
    Typical outputSource-linked memo, comparison, chart, or evidence-change reviewCited answer or one-off research reportCharts, screens, estimates, and portfolio viewsCited synthesis, monitoring, and client-ready deliverables
    What carries forwardSources, assumptions, open questions, and prior conclusionsChat history or projects that you organiseWatchlists, alerts, dashboards, and saved screensShared monitoring and research workflows across a firm
    Data posturePublic and user-provided sources, with uncertainty kept visibleOpen web and connected apps, depending on the productLicensed financial datasets and market feedsPremium, proprietary, and internal content
    Buying pathSelf-serve · 7-day trial · $59/monthUsually self-serve with free and paid tiersFree to professional tiers, often priced by data depthTypically sales-led with custom or per-seat pricing

    Oxaide Research

    Best for thesis review

    Financial research agents

    Best when you need to
    Investigating a company or market question and reviewing what changed
    You start with
    A company, asset, filing, dataset, event, or thesis to test
    Typical output
    Source-linked memo, comparison, chart, or evidence-change review
    What carries forward
    Sources, assumptions, open questions, and prior conclusions
    Data posture
    Public and user-provided sources, with uncertainty kept visible
    Buying path
    Self-serve · 7-day trial · $59/month

    General AI research

    Chat and search tools

    Best when you need to
    Broad questions and mixed day-to-day tasks
    You start with
    A prompt, search, or uploaded file
    Typical output
    Cited answer or one-off research report
    What carries forward
    Chat history or projects that you organise
    Data posture
    Open web and connected apps, depending on the product
    Buying path
    Usually self-serve with free and paid tiers

    Market data platforms

    Screeners and terminals

    Best when you need to
    Screening, charting, and monitoring structured market data
    You start with
    A ticker, filter, watchlist, or dashboard
    Typical output
    Charts, screens, estimates, and portfolio views
    What carries forward
    Watchlists, alerts, dashboards, and saved screens
    Data posture
    Licensed financial datasets and market feeds
    Buying path
    Free to professional tiers, often priced by data depth

    Enterprise intelligence

    Premium research suites

    Best when you need to
    Premium content, internal data, and large-team workflows
    You start with
    A proprietary corpus or configured team workflow
    Typical output
    Cited synthesis, monitoring, and client-ready deliverables
    What carries forward
    Shared monitoring and research workflows across a firm
    Data posture
    Premium, proprietary, and internal content
    Buying path
    Typically sales-led with custom or per-seat pricing

    The practical difference: Oxaide is not a terminal and not a general chatbot. It is an agent system for doing and revisiting financial research with the evidence attached.

    Try Oxaide free

    Simple pricing

    One plan for the complete research product.

    Researcher includes the financial research agent, saved analysis, generated files, scheduled runs, one private account, and a clear monthly usage limit. A research run = one finished research exchange (search, tools, memo, files) — billed as one, capped, no surprise overage.

    Researcher

    50 research runs each month · saved theses and watchlists · weekly evidence digest · 1 seat · email support

    Hard stop at included limit. No auto-overage.

    $59 / month

    USD · billed monthly · cancel before renewal

    Start free trial

    7-day trial with 10 full research runs. No card required. Researcher stops at the included monthly limit.

    No card · 7 days · 10 runs

    Put a company, filing, or market claim under review.

    Start free, inspect the sources and output, then keep only the research that deserves another look. Private by default — you decide what to share.

    What you get in the trialFree
    • ✓ Source-linked memos + charts
    • ✓ Saved thesis + evidence snapshot
    • ✓ One scheduled re-review
    Start free trialView pricing — $59/mo, 50 runs