Oxaide Finance Ops
SaaS plans from S$99/moSprint builds from S$18,800

Fix one messy finance workflow in 10 business days.

AI finance ops software for reviewable workflows, with human approval and clear delivery boundaries. Start with one messy finance process and turn it into a calmer workflow with visible status, ownership, and next steps.

View pricing
Start with a paid plan first. Use the optional onboarding diagnostic only when the rollout still needs scoping.
Best when you have one finance workflow owner, one approval boundary, and a few real sample files.
Oxaide leads with Finance Ops. Tender Ops remains a secondary workflow module, and Support Assistant fits where repeat questions, intake, or routing need productized automation.
Best for month-end finance workflowsBuilt for finance teamsHuman approval by defaultReviewable by designNo giant software project
Example finance layer

What the sprint replaces

Spreadsheet sprawl. Missing references. Month-end anxiety.

One intake path, one exception queue, one approval step, one clean output. Less chasing, fewer duplicate records, and a calmer AI-assisted way to finish recurring finance work.

Working first version
Invoices, exports, spreadsheets
Captured into one intake path
AI-assisted extraction
Helps pull out fields your team needs
Exception queue
Human reviews matches before downstream action
Report + evidence pack
Status, exceptions, sources, and final output
Best fit

Best for finance workflows with messy inputs, repeated exceptions, and real consequences.

This is for teams who are not shopping for a vague AI demo. They need one repeated finance workflow to stop eating time, hiding exceptions, pushing review into chat threads, or making management reporting unreliable.

Month-end finance pack

Bring invoices, bank exports, payment records, accounting CSVs, and spreadsheets into one reviewable finance workflow.

Reconciliation and exceptions

Suggest matches, flag duplicates, surface missing references, and keep unresolved items in a clear exception queue.

Approval and reporting

Keep human approval, source-linked evidence, handover notes, and management summaries visible before final decisions.

What gets built
One workflow. One useful first version. No giant transformation program.

One finance workflow intake path

One assisted extraction or matching step

One exception and approval queue

One dashboard for status, evidence, and ownership

One management report or evidence pack export

30 days of bug support after launch

Why Oxaide can do the harder cases
A focused offer built around traceability, review gates, month-end pressure, and operational accountability.
Our workflow experience shaped how we handle evidence, exceptions, and sign-off under pressure.
We are strongest when a workflow has multiple file types, handoffs, monthly deadlines, and edge cases.
Human approval stays in the loop by default.
We improve one workflow first, not your whole operations stack.
The goal is a working internal tool your team actually uses, not an AI demo that dies after the pitch.
Ways to start

Start with the product if the finance workflow is clear. Use the optional diagnostic only if the edges need sorting out first.

Some teams are ready to start with a self-serve plan right away. Others need a short onboarding step so we can define the failure points, approval boundary, and first rollout together.

A good first workflow usually has a visible cost or review risk: lost time, month-end delays, slower follow-up, reporting gaps, or too many exceptions being managed manually.
If you can name the workflow, owner, approval step, sample files, and desired output, a self-serve plan is usually enough to start. If not, send a short brief first and we will help narrow it.
Optional Workflow Diagnostic
S$1,500

Use this only when the workflow boundary is still unclear and you need help scoping the first rollout path.

Agree on one workflow to improve

Review sample files, exports, and real exceptions

Confirm approval boundaries and exclusions

Leave with the clearest sprint or no-build next step

Finance Ops Plans
From S$99/mo

Best when one finance workflow is clear enough to start and the team wants a self-serve SaaS product with usage-based scaling.

Finance workflow live fast

Assisted intake, extraction, exception, and approval logic

Clear scope, checkpoints, and delivery boundaries

Executive-ready outputs and team onboarding

Workflow examples

Pick one finance workflow that is costly when it goes wrong.

The best projects are repeated every month, easy to describe, full of file handling or approvals, and painful enough that the team already wants relief.

Invoice and payment matching

Normalize vendors, amounts, dates, invoice references, and payment exports into a reviewed matching table.

Exception queue and follow-up notes

Flag duplicates, missing references, unusual amounts, stale items, and unresolved records for human review.

Approval log and evidence pack

Keep source files, match basis, manual overrides, and approval decisions attached to the final output.

Monthly management reporting

Turn reviewed records, exceptions, and summary notes into a cleaner pack for management review.

Tender ops template

Keep proposal, compliance, document collection, and deadline workflows as a secondary template for tender-heavy teams.

Grant-ready project documentation

Prepare scope, deliverables, screenshots, training notes, and project summaries where the client needs support documentation.

Good fit
These projects usually move calmly and create value quickly.
One finance workflow is causing repeated friction, month-end delays, missing evidence, or review risk.
The work involves messy inputs, exceptions, or approvals that generic tools do not handle well.
Your team can share real sample files and give one owner for reviews.
You want a serious first build, not the cheapest possible automation demo.
Not a fit
These are better handled as a larger project or after the operating rules are clearer.
Company-wide system replacement or multi-department redesign.
A project where the scope or operating rules change every day.
No examples, no process owner, and no clear starting point yet.
Fully automatic accounting, tax, payroll, payment, or audit decisions with no human approval step.
Secondary template

Tender ops stays available for teams where proposals are the real recurring pain.

Use tender operations when the client is already tender-heavy and the workflow has a named owner, samples, repeated proposal pain, compliance checklists, deadline pressure, and clear submission outputs. It should not dilute the finance-first homepage message.

Typical tender scope

  • Opportunity monitoring
  • Requirement extraction
  • Compliance checklisting
  • Document collection
  • Proposal skeleton drafting
  • Submission pack review
Delivery flow

A simple path from messy finance process to working first version.

We keep the first step small enough to understand and useful enough to matter. One workflow, one owner, one clear build cycle with a visible review boundary.

Step 1

Friendly fit check

We review the finance workflow, failure points, sample files, and required output, then confirm whether this is a sensible first rollout.

Step 2

Clear first version

We define what the first version includes, where human review sits, and what success looks like before rollout begins.

Step 3

Configure and review

We configure the intake, extraction or matching step, exception queue, dashboard, approval flow, and reporting output for one workflow.

Step 4

Go-live and support

Your team gets onboarding, a stable operating flow, and 30 days of bug support after launch.

Next step

Start with the finance workflow that is costing the most attention.

If the workflow is already obvious, start with a paid plan and move into usage. If the edges are messy, use the optional S$1,500 onboarding step to pin down the first rollout before go-live.

View pricing